网站综合信息 wpfdisciples.wordpress.com
    • 标题:
    • WPF Disciples | where all WPF Disciple 
    • 关键字:
    •  
    • 描述:
    • where all WPF Disciples meet up and chat ... 
    • 域名信息
    • 域名年龄:25年9个月23天  注册日期:2000年03月03日  到期时间:2020年03月03日
      邮箱:abusecomplaints  电话:+1.2083895740
      注册商:MarkMonitor Inc. 
    • 备案信息
    • 备案号: 
    网站收录SEO数据
    • 搜索引擎
    • 收录量
    • 反向链接
    • 其他
    • 百度
    • 0  
    • 0  
    • 快照:无首页快照  
    • Google
    • 43  
    • 13  
    • pr:3  
    • 雅虎
    • 0  
    •  
    •  
    • 搜搜
    • 0  
    •  
    •  
    • 搜狗
    • 0  
    •  
    • 评级:0/10  
    • 360搜索
    • 0  
    •  
    •  
    域名流量Alexa排名
    •  
    • 一周平均
    • 一个月平均
    • 三个月平均
    • Alexa全球排名
    • -  
    • 平均日IP
    • 日总PV
    • 人均PV(PV/IP比例)
    • 反向链接
    • dmoz目录收录
    • -  
    • 流量走势图
    域名注册Whois信息

    wordpress.com

    域名年龄: 25年9个月23天
    注册时间: 2000-03-03
    到期时间: 2020-03-03
    注 册 商: MarkMonitor Inc.
    注册邮箱: abusecomplaints
    联系电话: +1.2083895740

    获取时间: 2020年01月21日 22:01:44
    Domain Name: WORDPRESS.COM
    Registry Domain ID: 21242797_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
    Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.markmonitor.com
    Registrar URL: http://www.markmonitor.com
    Updated Date: 2017-01-12T22:53:10Z
    Creation Date: 2000-03-03T12:13:23Z
    Registry Expiry Date: 2020-03-03T12:13:23Z
    Registrar: MarkMonitor Inc.
    Registrar IANA ID: 292
    Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abusecomplaints
    Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.2083895740
    Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
    Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
    Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
    Domain Status: serverDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#serverDeleteProhibited
    Domain Status: serverTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#serverTransferProhibited
    Domain Status: serverUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#serverUpdateProhibited
    Name Server: NS1.WORDPRESS.COM
    Name Server: NS2.WORDPRESS.COM
    Name Server: NS3.WORDPRESS.COM
    Name Server: NS4.WORDPRESS.COM
    DNSSEC: unsigned
    URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
    >>> Last update of whois database: 2020-01-21T14:01:24Z <<<

    For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

    Domain Name: wordpress.com
    Registry Domain ID: 21242797_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
    Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.markmonitor.com
    Registrar URL: http://www.markmonitor.com
    Updated Date: 2019-11-08T10:46:00-0800
    Creation Date: 2000-03-03T04:13:23-0800
    Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2020-03-03T04:13:23-0800
    Registrar: MarkMonitor, Inc.
    Registrar IANA ID: 292
    Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abusecomplaints
    Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.2083895770
    Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited (https://www.icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited)
    Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited (https://www.icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited)
    Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited (https://www.icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited)
    Domain Status: serverUpdateProhibited (https://www.icann.org/epp#serverUpdateProhibited)
    Domain Status: serverTransferProhibited (https://www.icann.org/epp#serverTransferProhibited)
    Domain Status: serverDeleteProhibited (https://www.icann.org/epp#serverDeleteProhibited)
    Registrant Organization: Automattic, Inc.
    Registrant State/Province: CA
    Registrant Country: US
    Registrant Email: Select Request Email Form at https://domains.markmonitor.com/whois/wordpress.com
    Admin Organization: Automattic, Inc.
    Admin State/Province: CA
    Admin Country: US
    Admin Email: Select Request Email Form at https://domains.markmonitor.com/whois/wordpress.com
    Tech Organization: Automattic, Inc.
    Tech State/Province: CA
    Tech Country: US
    Tech Email: Select Request Email Form at https://domains.markmonitor.com/whois/wordpress.com
    Name Server: ns3.wordpress.com
    Name Server: ns4.wordpress.com
    Name Server: ns1.wordpress.com
    Name Server: ns2.wordpress.com
    DNSSEC: unsigned
    URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/
    >>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2020-01-21T05:59:15-0800 <<<

    For more information on WHOIS status codes, please visit:
    https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/epp-status-codes

    If you wish to contact this domain’s Registrant, Administrative, or Technical
    contact, and such email address is not visible above, you may do so via our web
    form, pursuant to ICANN’s Temporary Specification. To verify that you are not a
    robot, please enter your email address to receive a link to a page that<
    其他后缀域名
    • 顶级域名
    • 相关信息
    网站首页快照(纯文字版)
    抓取时间:2015年11月22日 23:40:09
    网址:http://wpfdisciples.wordpress.com/
    标题:WPF Disciples | where all WPF Disciples meet up and chat 
    关键字:
    描述:where all WPF Disciples meet up and chat ...
    主体:
    WPF Discipleswhere all WPF Disciples meet up and chat …HomeAboutMember Bio'sResourcesFrameworkElement vs. FrameworkContentElement9102008FrameworkElement (FE) derives from UIElement.  FrameworkContentElement (FCE) derives from ContentElement.  Since the framework is not built on a language that supports multiple inheritance (and thank god for that!), the divergence was necessary.  There are parts of ContentElement that you wouldn’t want in every FE and there are parts of UIElement that you wouldn’t want in every FCE.FCE basically exists to support the text formatting engine (which can be found in the MS.Internal.Text namespace).  There are a few non-text classes that derive from FCE, but they do this just to be lightweight.The goal was to make the programming experience for dealing with an FE and FCE as similar as possible.  If anything, I think this makes the framework *more* elegant.You can think of an FCE as having everything an FE has except support for layout/rendering.  Of course, this is no small feature and you certainly would not want that kind of overhead in every text element.  Imagine the perf if you tried to render every textual stroke using WPF’s layout engine… text is far too complex.True, it’s weird to see the exact same properties, methods, interfaces, events, etc, defined on two completely different base classes.  But I guess my general response is a big shrug.  As long as Microsoft is willing to maintain the code, I don’t have a problem with it.  (And in truth, much of the code shared between the classes is codegen’d anyway during the build process, so its really not that hard for them to maintain… clever chaps!)Sidenote:  IFE vs. LIFE:  A mnemonic we used to use is “LIFE begins at UIElement”.  That is to say, every UIElement supports Layout, Input, Focus, and Events.  ContentElement gives you everything but the ‘L’.  As such, the intersection of functionality between an FE and FCE is the IFE portion.I recommend creating a helper class if you want to treat the IFE portion of framework objects in a polymorphic manner.  It’s easy enough to implement…  in fact, you can steal most of the implementation from the internal FrameworkObject class.  :-)Content Source: Dr. WPFSource: threadComments : 21 Comments »Categories : wpfWhy WPF is ready for LOB24042008A rather interesting, though horribly misnamed, thread started on the WPF Forum.  The “Why WPF is not ready for LOB” thread contains quite a few insightful perspectives on the topic of WPF’s viability for line-of-business (LOB) development.  The thread also contains links to blog posts that carry the discussion out further.If you have something to say about WPF for LOB that has not yet been introduced on that thread, please take the time to share with the rest of us.  This is an important topic for WPF at this point in its life.Comments : 15 Comments »Tags: LOB, wpfCategories : LOB, wpfDebugging in WPF – WPF Discip

    © 2010 - 2020 网站综合信息查询 同IP网站查询 相关类似网站查询 网站备案查询网站地图 最新查询 最近更新 优秀网站 热门网站 全部网站 同IP查询 备案查询

    2025-12-15 07:34, Process in 0.0104 second.