blog.org
域名年龄: 24年4个月28天HTTP/1.1 301 永久重定向 访问时间:2015年06月19日 13:52:18 服务器:Apache/2.4.7 (Ubuntu) 语言环境:PHP/5.5.9-1ubuntu4.9 X-Pingback: http://blog.org/xmlrpc.php 目标网址:http://blog.org/ Keep-Alive: timeout=5, max=100 连接:Keep-Alive Transfer-Encoding: chunked 类型:text/html; charset=UTF-8 HTTP/1.1 200 OK 访问时间:2015年06月19日 13:52:18 服务器:Apache/2.4.7 (Ubuntu) 语言环境:PHP/5.5.9-1ubuntu4.9 X-Pingback: http://blog.org/xmlrpc.php 动作:Accept-Encoding Content-Encoding: gzip Keep-Alive: timeout=5, max=100 连接:Keep-Alive Transfer-Encoding: chunked 类型:text/html; charset=UTF-8 网站编码:UTF-8
DavidBrake's blogUpdates on the Internet and its social and public policy implications,useful websites, political/cultural musings and more from a Canadianacademic, internet consultant and journalist26 March 2015The news “long tail” – are readers, journalists’ and advertisers interests diverging?Filed under:About the Internet,journalism,problems with technology,social media at10:40 amTwo recent pieces of news made me think about the issue of timing of news consumed online. Most obviously, online publication pushes journalists to publish ever-faster, but the ability to archive everything means there is also a place for “evergreen” features and explainers. Once done, as long as they are revisited from time to time to ensure they are still relevant, they can continue to draw people to your writing via search, and as a journalism educator I have long encouraged my students to produce and value such pieces.Shirley Li points out in the Atlantic that even quite old pieces of ‘news’ can end up being recirculated as if they were new. Her concern is that people sometimes don’t realize that online news recirculated this way is outdated (because timestamps on stories can often be hard to find) but this also suggests once again that older news stories/features can also have continued value.Alarmingly, however, it seems that online advertisers (at least in one case) place very little value on readers’ attention if it was drawn by old material. According to Jim Romenesko, journalists for Forbes magazine (who are paid per click) will be paid only a quarter as much as before for visits to pages that are more than 90 days old. According to a memo passed to Romanesko, “advertisers are increasingly buying premium ads for new content, not old”.It is unclear why advertisers would necessarily prefer a view of a new story to a view of a similarly interesting and accurate but older story. However if this were part of a larger trend, what would be the implications? Will this encourage editors to superficially refresh even “evergreen” stories to make them “new” for advertisers? (Keeping a closer editorial eye on older stories might be no bad thing). Might this mean that rather than updating old stories, they are deleted or unlinked and new stories based on the old ones will be written (which among other things would complicate site archives and contribute greatly to the problem of “link rot” where links to old journalism vanish)?Comments (0)18 March 2015Are we seeing the death of the discussion forum?Filed under:About the Internet,Academia,Online media,research,social media,Virtual Communities at6:47 pmI am used as a journalism professor to suggesting to my students that for any specialist topic – a disease, a hobby, a location – they should seek out the online discussion forums chat rooms or mailing lists that relate to it. These can act as sources of ex
© 2010 - 2020 网站综合信息查询 同IP网站查询 相关类似网站查询 网站备案查询网站地图 最新查询 最近更新 优秀网站 热门网站 全部网站 同IP查询 备案查询
2024-03-29 15:56, Process in 0.0055 second.