The Friends of Lever ParkProtecting Lever Park and Rivington for the futureSkip to contentHomeAbout UsContactGalleryMap of Lever Park and Rivington← Older postsA Map of Lever Park and RivingtonPosted on September 2, 2012 by adminShare this:EmailFacebookStumbleUponTwitterTumblrPinterestPosted in News|Leave a commentWinter Photo GalleryPosted on February 22, 2012 by DavidShare this:EmailFacebookStumbleUponTwitterTumblrPinterestPosted in News|Leave a commentWhen is 14 not 14Posted on September 30, 2011 by bobdootsonWhen go-ape change their maximum persons per session to 18.The new car park (not yet developed) for 45 cars, was calculated on the maximum person per session at peak times being 14.Seeing that they have altered their maximum per session to 18 at selected peak times, does that mean they will be recalculating the car park size to serve the new maximum persons per session.By our calculations the new car park will have to accommodate 57 cars.Car parks must be developed to suite maximum capacity per session at peak times.Share this:EmailFacebookStumbleUponTwitterTumblrPinterestPosted in News|Leave a comment54 days and still waitingPosted on September 13, 2011 by bobdootsonAfter 54 days, Go-Ape still haven’t answered the question:Where in Rivington is the On-Site parking for;95 cars40 light goods vehicles100 motor cycles4 disabled spaces4 busesDon’t forget, this is ON-SITE parking, plus the fact they quote 95 cars indicates they have developed a new car park for 45 vehicles.How interesting is this figure for ON-SITE parking ,(the bottom barn car park is OFF-SITE) so they can’t refer to this.Why did the planning department not pick up on this, and why where go-ape allowed to submit parking figures for planning application 10/00426/FUL, that indicated that the new car park for 45 cars had been developed.Mathematics:  08/00553/FUL showed 50 on site car spaces                              10/00426/FUL showed 95 on site car spacesWhat’s the next move?submit a retrospective application that will only provide total spaces for what they have now 14 approx (yes 14 approx)not the;95 cars40 light goods vehicles100 motor cycles4 disabled spaces4 busessubmitted with planning application 10/00426/FULShare this:EmailFacebookStumbleUponTwitterTumblrPinterestPosted in News|1 CommentWill they or won’t theyPosted on September 6, 2011 by bobdootsonTo-night the planning committee sit to decide whether to accept the retrospective application for the landing zones.Will they ignore the 1902 Act and allow the provisions within to be breached ?Will they ignore the conditions set by their own planning authority, in this case “Trading will not be allowed until the car park is developed according to the approved plans”?If they ignore the conditions set by their own officers, then why set the conditions in the first place?And lets not forget…… Go-Ape agreed to the conditions set… report here in 24 hours, but d