网站综合信息 www.think.net
    • 标题:
    • Thinknet 
    • 关键字:
    •  
    • 描述:
    •  
    • 域名信息
    • 域名年龄:30年5个月24天  注册日期:1994年11月23日  到期时间:2013年11月22日
      注册商:GODADDY.COM, LLC 
    • 备案信息
    • 备案号: 
    网站收录SEO数据
    • 搜索引擎
    • 收录量
    • 反向链接
    • 其他
    • Google
    • 0  
    • 0  
    • pr:2  
    • 雅虎
    • 0  
    •  
    •  
    • 搜搜
    • 0  
    •  
    •  
    • 搜狗
    • 0  
    •  
    • 评级:0/10  
    • 360搜索
    • 0  
    •  
    •  
    域名流量Alexa排名
    •  
    • 一周平均
    • 一个月平均
    • 三个月平均
    • Alexa全球排名
    • -  
    • 平均日IP
    • 日总PV
    • 人均PV(PV/IP比例)
    • 反向链接
    • 153 
    • dmoz目录收录
    • -  
    • 流量走势图
    域名注册Whois信息

    think.net

    域名年龄: 30年5个月24天
    注册时间: 1994-11-23
    到期时间: 2013-11-22
    注 册 商: GODADDY.COM, LLC

    获取时间: 2013年10月22日 20:27:11
    Domain Name: THINK.NET
    Registrar: GODADDY.COM, LLC
    Whois Server: whois.godaddy.com
    Referral URL: http://registrar.godaddy.com
    Name Server: NS01.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
    Name Server: NS02.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
    Status: clientDeleteProhibited
    Status: clientRenewProhibited
    Status: clientTransferProhibited
    Status: clientUpdateProhibited
    Updated Date: 2012-10-11
    Creation Date: 1994-11-23
    Expiration Date: 2013-11-22

    >>> Last update of whois database: Tue, 2013-Oct-22 12:28:42 UTC <<<

    Domain Name: THINK.NET
    Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com
    Registrant Name: Kent Palmer
    Registrant Organization:
    Name Server: NS01.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
    Name Server: NS02.DOMAINCONTROL.COM

    For complete domain details go to:
    http://who.godaddy.com/whoischeck.aspx?domain=THINK.NET
    同IP网站(同服务器)
    其他后缀域名
    • 顶级域名
    • 相关信息
    网站首页快照(纯文字版)
    抓取时间:2014年09月20日 00:26:07
    网址:http://www.think.net/
    标题:Thinknet
    关键字:
    描述:
    主体:
    Quora answer: Why are there so many projects to build The One Ontology to Rule Them All?May                22                2014It is like programming languages only not as bad, why are there so many programming languages being developed now? Because there are a myriad ideas on how to do it and they are fighting out a survival of the fittest sort of game. What is really happening is that a lot of domain specific ontologies are being created. One ontology to rule them all is a pipe dream. The implicit knowledge in the world is just too complex. As far as I know only Cyc has the idea of trying to explicitly cover everything. I recommend Sowa’s approach Guided Tour of OntologyNo responses yetQuora answer:  What are single-hoofed horses in the Iliad?May                22                2014Soliped Pictures and DefinitionBut we must not forget that the horse has a special place in Homer.For instance there is the Trojan HorseAnd there are the horses of Poseidon [See also POSEIDON : Greek God of the Sea & Earthquakes]There are the immortal horses: HIPPOI ATHANATOIAnd there are the brothers of Helen who were famous as horsemen: Castor and PolluxSo the fact that the Horse had a single hoof was a way of calling it out and giving it dignity over other animals.No responses yetQuora answer: What is the difference between Continental and Analytic philosophy?May                22                2014My churlish answer is that there is real philosophy and there is fake philosophy, and the ones who claim to be the real philosophers and to denigrate the others are the ones who are the most under suspicion. In other words the Analytical philosophers claim that Continental philosophy is fake philosophy, (meaningless and senseless) and that Analytical philosophy is the true philosophy while for the most part other Continental philosophers just get on with their work and have no concern for denigrating Analytical Philosophy. So it should be our suspicion that the ones claiming to be the real philosophers while running down others must have something to hide. And part of what they have to hide is that theirs is really the fake philosophy. Let us remember that analytical philosophy started out as an anti-philosophy saying that all metaphysics was an illusion. Continental Philosophy is merely the European Philosophical tradition getting on with its own evolution and its own concerns. It is Analytical Philosophy that took an anti-philosophical turn in England and then America, which was shaped by anti-communism of the McCarthy era more than anything else. Analytical Philosophers are specialists who have nothing to say about anything outside their speciality, while Continental Philosophy takes as its subject matter a wide swath of human culture as its materials such as literature, psychoanalysis,  western culture and society, politics, etc. See the writings of Zizek as an extreme example. In other words Continental Philosophy is engaged in the totality of our mod

    © 2010 - 2020 网站综合信息查询 同IP网站查询 相关类似网站查询 网站备案查询网站地图 最新查询 最近更新 优秀网站 热门网站 全部网站 同IP查询 备案查询

    2025-05-08 08:21, Process in 0.0042 second.